|
|
发表于 2005-3-16 22:04:47
|
显示全部楼层
>再过几个月,我就要毕业。可能没有时间再去升级ibox了
Oh, no! 
>我能做的可能就是厚积薄发,慢慢地去发现或者构造新的LiveCD亮点。
Look forward to seeing it. ;)
>2. 我会为ibox做一个官方网站,以org为顶级域名,二级域名还没有想好,大家也帮忙想想(也是出于冲突的考虑)。我会使用中文drupal来营建网站,类似我的好友hiweed的网站。
Good choice, drupal is a very nice CMS.
>在此感谢众位对ibox-LiveCD的支持。或许,ibox未来可能不复存在,但是希望ibox内涵的DIY精神可以给予兄弟们一点点启示。谢谢。
Refer to the introduction of iBOX, you did not create it for fun, did you?
教主,hyoga兄 asked you the following question in http://www.linuxsir.cn/bbs/showt ... p;page=14&pp=15
作者: hyoga
诶?俺怎么没有早点看见这么好的东西啊,比konppix如何啊?
And you replied:
knoppix是LIVECD之母,自然有很多经典的特色。
IBOX希望能将这些特色继往开来,同时提供很多好的双刃剑给予用户选择。
And then, I suggest you to consider:
how may you differentiate iBox from the other LiveCDs?
I noticed distrowatch.com reported many one-man distros were failed due to various reasons. However, there seems to have some common points, many failure projects were just me-too, derivatives of existing distros or started development for certain good reasons but eventually lost the directions or positions.
I rised this question because I worried that iBOX might lack a concrete model of development. Sorry, this term seems a little bit academic. Here, I am refering "a model of development" as the operation mode that drives and maintains your development such that you can reach certain goal by well defined "markets" and "positions" and, of course, supports from people.
For example, if we look at Hiweed Debian, we can notice Hiweed has a very clear goal. Hiweed has Desktop edition, Server edition and a LiveCD targeting various "markets" and people.
I believe iBOX can achieve further leap of success. Don't let it down.
Anyway, 教主,you should be very proud for the creation of iBOX. I really appreciated for your hard works and your kindness.
Cheers! |
|